Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/23/1998 03:45 PM House HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 302 - UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA OPERATING BUDGET Number 1219 CHAIRMAN BUNDE announced the next item on the agenda was HB 302, "An Act relating to the University of Alaska; and providing for an effective date." He noted the committee had adopted committee substitute 0-LS1285\F, Ford, 4/16/98, at a previous meeting. CHAIRMAN BUNDE read the following intent language from the 1989 legislature: "It is the intent of the legislature that the University of Alaska administration review and compile information on student enrollment, credit hours and productivity at all university campuses. It is the further intent of the legislature that this information be used to develop a formula approach as an alternative method of allocating and reallocating funding for these campuses, and that this formula approach alternative be presented with the university's FY 89 budget request." CHAIRMAN BUNDE asked why the university has not complied with the intent of the legislature some ten years ago. Number 1310 WENDY REDMAN, Vice President, Statewide University of Alaska System, said, "Actually, we did comply with the intent. We had a model that we used -- as you may recall we -- since you were elected in 1992, I believe -- I believe that was the last year we had an increase - the only increased funding we've received other than we had two years in the last six where we got some salary money for the collective bargaining agreements - other than that the only new money we've received was money that you were helpful in getting $2 million for University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) for instructional positions. And that's really the last increment that we've had for any money. So, we've been using the model that was developed - we have two models that were developed -- actually it's a series of models -- an instructional model, physical plant model, and a faculty salary allocation model that were developed in 1991. We worked on them through the course of that year and they've been used essentially to sort of help us figure out how to reduce the budget and models aren't as effective to reduce the budget as they are to increase the budget." Number 1380 REPRESENTATIVE BRICE asked Chairman Bunde how he arrived at the four different groups. CHAIRMAN BUNDE responded it was based on his experience working at the university and modeled on other states. Number 1420 REPRESENTATIVE BRICE said, "There are a couple of other statements I want to be very clear. We'd made mention that this was a funding formula; it's not a funding formula, it's an allocation formula, first of all. The next concern I have is what happens if the university develops a program that isn't in one of these four groups that are currently here? I mean, we're making the assumption that the university is a static institution; that these are the programs that will be provided forever and ever and that if any other new program is to ever be developed, they're going to have to come back to the legislature to be put into one of these four groups. What was your thoughts on that?" CHAIRMAN BUNDE said certainly future programs would be placed in one of these categories based on the university's point of view. REPRESENTATIVE BRICE said that caused him concern - it will be based on the university's point of view, as well as the political support the program might have. He said discussions involving allocation of a shrinking pie is never a fun issue, and he believes the discussion should focus on how to increase the pie. CHAIRMAN BUNDE said he agreed; he thinks the allocation comes before the pie increases, but he advocates for enlarging the pie. Number 1528 MS. REDMAN expressed her appreciation to Chairman Bunde for the changes that were made to HB 302 and said it now comes very close to the formula currently being developed with Chancellor Gorsuch's committee; however, she still believes it should not be put in statute. She also appreciated that HB 302 provides for allocations of increased money. CHAIRMAN BUNDE pointed out it also calls for a 2 percent inflationary increase. REPRESENTATIVE GREEN recalled the UAA campus has a significant number of part time students and inquired how the head count on a part time student compares to a full time student under HB 302. MS. REDMAN said everything is converted to full time equivalent (FTE) so it accommodates the part-time students the same, so there's no advantage or disadvantage. She further explained, "It's depending on the number of credits that are taken by students and then we divide the number of credits by 12 and that equals one FTE." CHAIRMAN BUNDE asked Ms. Redman for the FTE of the various campuses. MS. REDMAN said the Fairbanks campus is approximately 3,500; the Anchorage campus is at about 6,800; and the Juneau campus is approximately 1,000. Number 1634 REPRESENTATIVE BRICE asked, "Relating to the inflation - now if you've got an inflation increase on an allocation formula for all campuses equal, how does that work if the funding level stays stagnant?" Number 1650 CHAIRMAN BUNDE said the inflation factor is for the total budget and then it's factored out through the formula. Number 1660 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER said it would be a formula program, much like the others, there would be a demand for increase, whether it's by student or by consumer price index (CPI). CHAIRMAN BUNDE explained, "The Chair's vision of this is that we have "x" amount in the university this year, inflation factor would 2 percent, so it would be "x" amount plus 2 percent and that money then would be disbursed through the formula." Number 1715 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER made a motion to move from committee CSHB 302 as amended with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. REPRESENTATIVE BRICE objected. CHAIRMAN BUNDE asked for a roll call vote. Representatives Dyson, Green, Porter and Bunde voted in favor of the motion. Representative Brice voted against it. Therefore, CSHB 302(HES) moved from the House Health, Education and Social Services Standing Committee on a vote of 4-1.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|